Lagoon, MBBR, MBR: Comparing wastewater systems

5–7 minutes

In the world of wastewater treatment, one size does not fit all.

Whether you’re a municipality, utility, industry, or private developer, the right system depends on space constraints, pollution types, effluent requirements, operator capacity, and budget. This guide compares the most common wastewater treatment strategies in North America: lagoons, MBBR, and MBR.

Not sure which one is right for you?

Read on for an outline of what works where and why. We break down the use cases, pros and cons, sludge management requirements, odors & emissions, and reuse potential for your wastewater.

Talk to an expert

Lagoons

The classic but space-hungry option.

Lagoons are one of the oldest wastewater treatment technologies in North America.

Lagoons are one of the oldest wastewater treatment technologies in North America. For instance they rely on gravity, retention time, and natural biological processes to break down contaminants. Their simplicity is their strength and their weakness.

Flowpoint is called in when lagoons can’t meet ammonia or BOD discharge requirements, especially when land is limited and fines are looming.

Commonly best for:

  • Small or rural municipalities
  • Sites with ample land
  • Locations with less rigid effluent requirements
Pros:Cons:
• Low operating cost
• Simple to run
• Minimal operator license requirements
• Long design life  
• Requires a lot of land
• Can have high up-front costs due to excavation
• Hard to meet modern ammonia and nutrient limits
• Odor and vector concerns
• Limited scalability
• Capacity limitations due to discharge permits

Sludge management requirements:

Lagoons collect sludge over time, which can include organic and inorganic waste. You need to consider that desludging events are costly and logistically difficult due to volume and transport needs.

Airborne emissions:

Overall, of the three most common types of wastewater treatment, lagoons have the highest potential for airborne emissions. This is because they require long retention times and exposure to ambient air. They often lack real-time aeration control, leading to varying oxygen levels that can release:

  • VOCs (chemical odors)
  • Ammonia (sharp, pungent smell)
  • Hydrogen sulfide (smells like rotten eggs).

Reuse potential:

Very low, as effluent often exceeds thresholds for solids, ammonia, and nutrients. Which further requires advanced wastewater treatment for any reuse scenario.

Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR)

The compact, upgrade-ready solution for meeting most discharge permits.

MBBRs use suspended biofilm media in aerated tanks to treat wastewater efficiently in a small footprint.

MBBRs use suspended biofilm media in aerated tanks to treat wastewater efficiently in a small footprint. Flowpoint’s engineered MBBR systems are specifically designed for operations facing aging infrastructure, permit pressure, and space constraints. Especially if they have an existing lagoon system that can’t meet current nutrient discharge limits.

Commonly best for:

  • Municipal upgrades, developments, resorts, food processing, industrial, packing plants, commercial applications, and lagoon replacements
  • Sites that need better ammonia removal and flexibility
  • Upgrading existing lagoon systems to meet strict discharge permits without an expansion of your existing setup.
Pros:Cons:
• Compact footprint
• Often lower up-front cost than lagoons or MBR
• Modular, scalable design
• Effective at removing BOD, ammonia, and phosphorus
• Low energy use compared to membrane systems
• Simple to operate and automate
• Requires some mechanical aeration
• May need filtration or UV for reuse
• May require additional operator certification  

Sludge management:

Produces manageable volumes of waste-activated sludge (WAS). Flowpoint systems are designed for predictable sludge handling coupled with integrated dewatering options.

Airborne emissions:

MBBRs have lower off-gassing than lagoons. They use aerated reactors that maintain aerobic conditions, thereby reducing H₂S production. In addition, the footprint is smaller and emissions can be easily managed or captured. A point often overlooked with MBBRs, is their shorter retention times, where organics break down the contaminants quickly with less chance of odor development that you typically see with an open air lagoon.

Moderate to high. With polishing, MBBR effluent can meet non-potable reuse standards for irrigation, dust control, or industrial applications. Recent research shows MBBRs can also be integrated into energy-optimized and decentralized wastewater systems that support energy neutrality when paired with compact solids separation and digestion.

Contact us and learn how to pair MBBR with an automated bulk water dispensing system to reclaim water.

Learn more about MBBR.

Membrane Bioreactor (MBR)

The go-to for tight permits and high reuse demand.

MBRs combine activated sludge with membrane filtration, producing high-quality effluent that meets or exceeds reuse standards.

MBRs combine activated sludge with membrane filtration, producing high-quality effluent that meets or exceeds reuse standards. Historically, MBRs have required high capital and energy input, but emerging designs are easing those barriers through hybrid systems and energy recovery.

Commonly best for:

  • Discharge permits requiring BOD₅ or TSS below 5 mg/L
  • Discharge into sensitive ecosystems
  • Complex industrial wastewater streams with high toxicity or salinity
Pros:Cons:
• Highest effluent quality
• Minimal land footprint
• Ideal for reuse and sensitive discharge zones
• Can handle saline and industrial wastewater, especially when integrated into hybrid MBBR-MBR systems
Compatible with advanced resource recovery technologies
• Higher upfront and O&M costs
• Requires operators with higher levels of certification
• Membranes need continuous cleaning and eventual replacement 

Sludge management

MBRs generate more frequent waste-activated sludge (WAS) due to high biomass concentration. Systems must be designed to handle sludge production and ensure proper membrane operation.

Airborne emissions:

MBRs, because of enclosed operations and membrane barriers, show the lowest potential for airborne contaminant release, especially with an advanced odor control implementation. MBRs are fully enclosed or semi-enclosed, minimizing air exchange with their surroundings. They use fine filtration membranes, which trap wastewater organics that could contribute to odor. They often include advanced odor control or air handling systems, especially in high-end or urban installations.

Reuse potential:

Very high. As a result MBRs produce effluent suitable for most reuse applications — from agricultural to industrial to indirect potable reuse. New research highlights hybrid MBR systems’ ability to improve nutrient capture and reduce membrane fouling while lowering energy intensity.

Learn more about going purple and tapping the resource of reclaimed water using bulk water dispensing stations.

FeatureLagoonMBBRMBR
Use caseRural, large footprintPermit-driven upgradesHigh-efficiency, reuse potential
FootprintLargeSmallVery small
Effluent qualityLowHighVery high
Energy usePassiveLowModerate to high
Sludge handling requirementsInfrequent, bulkyPredictable, manageableFrequent, dense
Reuse potentialLowModerate to highVery high
Operator skillMinimalBasicHigh
Up-front cost (CapEx)Moderate to high (land-based)ModerateHigh
Ongoing operation costs (OpEx)LowLow to moderateHigh

So, which wastewater solution should you choose?

There’s no one-size-fits-all answer, but there is a right-sized solution for your site, goals, and budget. Flowpoint can help you identify the optimal technology and guide you through design, permitting, and implementation.

Every situation is unique, but our general rule of thumb is:

  • Choose lagoons when land is abundant and effluent requirements are low
  • Choose MBBR when you need scalable performance, permit compliance, and cost control. Especially when upgrading an existing lagoon or planning phased growth in your municipality or development
  • Choose MBR when discharge limits are tight, space is scarce, or water reuse is the priority

Let Flowpoint help you solve your wastewater challenges.

Got a unique issue, looming fines, or tight discharge limit? Let’s figure this out together.

In fact, we’re the water and wastewater experts. We’ll steer you right.

Request my consultation


Jay Morrison Avatar

Our professional team is ready to see your project complete smoothly, with quality, and on time. Our legendary customer support is with you all the way. Contact us today and learn how Flowpoint Environmental Systems can help you achieve success.

Flushing fire hydrants in traditional water systems can waste excess water while maintaining chlorine levels.